| katedonovan ( @ 2007-06-16 11:26:00 |
| Current mood: | |
| Entry tags: | writing |
Two many heroes?
I had a different entry half completed, but I'm putting it aside to draw your attention to a good column written by Lori Devoti over at romancingtheblog.com this morning. She lists some of the major romance conventions and asks which ones we'd like to say bye-bye to.
The one that caught my eye, predictably, is the one I've ranted about here before -- editors are convinced that romance readers don't want real love triangles. Fake ones, okay - -but if you can't tell who the hero is right away, editors will tell you that in your case, WIP means wallbanger in progress, not work in progress.
I don't think the editors are correct. Sure, there might be a few readers who have an absolute rule against this, but I'm willing to bet the huge majority would love to mix it up a little, hero-wise. Aren't readers always saying they want variety? And frankly, I'm a reader myself, and I love those kinds of plots.
Especially in romantic suspense! It's a win-win, right? It ups the suspense, and you get two hunky guys to enjoy. Sometimes the fake hero turns out to be the villain -- I love those. And even if the one who loses out is a great guy, well the beauty there is, the heroine goes into the sunset with the real hero, and you get the other one! (Until he gets his own book someday)
I'm not suggesting that a writer should drag it out right till the end. But if there's some question about which guy is Mr Right for the first third of the book, let's say -- or a moment of huge doubt half way through -- is that so terrible? (Or is it fantastic? I think so)
Oh well, I could be wrong. But I have a lot of faith in my readers. They wouldn't want a steady diet of love triangles, but every once in a while? Bring it on! Otherwise, some really fun plots get abandoned by the wayside.
Kate